By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tonio_13 on 20 July 2010
Edit Thread
kowenicki said:
tonio_13 said:
kowenicki said:
Goddbless said:

Your numbers for EMEAA aren't accurate either as the 360s was out in Australia and New Zealand for some time already. You should look up those launch dates and add the numbers accordingly.



Correct

He will need to add some numbers to the EMEAA launch... Aus and NZ. 

So 198 071 - 5338 (this week 360 numbers) = 192 733

8261 (nulbers for 3rd july, the launch in Aus and NZ) = 200 994

So the first week in EMEEA is 200 994


I guess... buit to make it simple just throw the first couple of weeks in... they are hardly big numbers.  then you can just report weekly numbers as normal from this week otherwise you will constantly be deducting and adding back in.

I'd report the first week as 212 (this week plus weeks ending 3rd and 10th for AUS/NZ - 14k) then just go from next week on.  its swings and roundabouts.

 

Sorry but why when you have the data you prefer en estimation ? If you don't believe me check the data by yourself. It took me less than one minute to check that. Sorry but if you want to be simple don't talk about australia & NZ.