Vetteman94 said:
Cypher1980 said:
Vetteman94 said:
sethnintendo said:
Vetteman94 said:
archer9234 said:
The reason why they don't use a SD card or other solid media, is the pricing. 50GB SD cards to equal Bluray space, are still in the expensive range. "You" don't like buying movies and TV shows. The rest of the world is differnet.
|
Correct, movies would cost close to $40 a piece if they were on SD cards or flash drives.
|
SD cards are getting cheaper each year and soon will be able to get 50gb for pretty damn cheap.
@archer9234, yes I am glad you said that. I am different from the rest of world. I would label myself as crazy if I was another person. You know what? I like being different. Better than being a mindless sheep.
|
You are a mindless sheep, you are paying for something you dont own and never will own, unlike my physical copy o the movie.
|
Sorry Dude you only own the physical medium not the copy of the movie.
The movie and all likeness contained within remains the property of the copyright holder !
Welcome to Crappy Corporate America
|
No, I own a copy of the movie on the physical medium, I may not have many rights to it like to make copies, but I still own a copy. My main point was my copy of the movie cant be taken away from me, while a digital copy can be.
|
Well I think your wrong regarding the legal aspects but your main point vis a vis ownership is valid.
Of course this isnt a problem for one time rental streaming.
The experience you had watching the movie and the memories cannot be taken away.
Its a really interesting time at the moment regarding movies and distribution.
More and more people seem to accept digital fast access to media as a valid distro channel.
I hope that eventually new release movies will be available in the home on the night of release.
