BMaker11 on 14 July 2010
Eurogamer: I think he's a bit misunderstood because he's trying to make lots of money when people think he has an obligation to make gamers happy.
Tim Schafer: His obligation is to his shareholders. Well, he doesn't have to be as much of a dick about it, does he? I think there is a way he can do it without being a total prick. It seems like it would be possible. It's not something he's interested in.
Umm.....isn't an obligation to make gamers happy essentially the same as having an obligation to his shareholders? We may not have stock in Activision, but if you make shitty games, we won't buy them. And then shares will go down in value, which will then piss off his shareholders
