By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
superchunk on 11 July 2010
Edit Thread
M.U.G.E.N said:
Rath said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
superchunk said:
psrock said:


LAWL but come onnnnnnnnn I wanted to be the one to show that review, bummer :D

anywho these camera are fraction of the price of this one and has more and better specs so yeah no matter how one spin it this is still a great cam..you called it a half breed even without a proper reason...yu say the quality will be bad when we still don't know that so unless we know for sure you just bashed on a sony product without proper reason and that is uber fail , better luck next time tho, keep trying.

ps; for the one who said this won't display the 3d pics, i can confirm it does...all you need is some googling before bashing anything non ninty, it makes you look silly

He called it a half breed because it's a single lens that requires you to actually physically move the camera to get a 3D effect. It's basically a standard camera with software giving the 3D, not a purpose built 3D camera.

Also I can confirm it doesn't display true 3D.

"Images can't be viewed in 3D on the camera's LCD. As an alternative, Sony has created a feature called Sweep Multi Angle. This mode will capture 15 images at different angles and combines them into one image. When the final image is displayed on screen, the user can tilt the camera to view the image through different angles, almost as if it's being displayed in 3D."

http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=4410


Nope he called it a half breed cuz he just wanted to bash on Sony, heck he coundn't even come up with a decent come back, in fact the product he showed was way way more pricy and had bad reviews....he just randomly bs on Sony forums

and what do you mean half breed? do YOU have any evidence that the 3d images it takes are not up the standards? if not your as bad as him or worse

it can diplay the 3d effect on the cam itself....you and i can argue all day long if that's real or w/e bla bla bla but it get's the job done...again unless you can show me the 3d effect it shows on the screen when tilted is not up to par with expectations then your also rambling on and on a made up definition of true 3d

oh and btw might wanna google the definition of half breed while your at it, doesn't sound like you have a clue


No I did exactly as Rath said, in fact I specifically called out their software solution in many posts.

I own many sony products and really like Sony cameras actually. I do not come in to Sony forums to bash Sony. However, this is another time I think they've jumped in with both feet into a nearly empty pool. PSP Go was the latest example of this. Also, the camera I showed would actually do a far better 3D experience, including the ability to actually show the user the 3D pic on the camera which this Sony cannot do. You just seem to ignore the relavent parts of my posts and go LOL OWNED HHAAAAHAHA YOU SUCK AHAHAH.

Now they have a 3D-ish camera that can't possibly be as good as a dual lense system, its simply physics, don't need to view it to realize that it won't be as good. Why do you think nearly every animal in existence has at least two eyes? FOR 3D DEPTH. I also admitted that the 2D pics would probably be really good as Sony cameras are generally built well. I just think that touting this as a 3D camera is stupid. It would be like touting the LG Envy Touch as a smart phone with a touch screen. It just doesn't really add up.