Mario games are 12 for 12 this gen -- All million-sellers

[LordTheNightKnight]

Famine said:

LordTheNightKnight said:

Well the snippets are where the inconsistencies lay. The thing is that your beef is based on some nonexistant rule that characters out of genre should not be made, or at leased released, in the North American region.

And my question remains unanswered, and just look at my two posts above this to find it.

So this doesn't cut the butter?:

"And yes, Sonic and Mega Man are good examples of developers putting them in many games, and I do apologize for being ignorant in a few posts and not mentioning characters such as Mega Man and Sonic, especially when I even mentioned Sonic in an earlier post. They aren't as successful, but the developers are putting them out there."

If they aren't that successful and they are still putting them out there, what do you think that would mean if they were successful?

@Kasz:

What are the name of those games? The only mobile games I was able to find were Mega Man platformers and card based games. I couldn't find that golf game you were talking about, nor the slots game. I even tried "pachinko," if that's what you meant.

Okay. Now answer this. Would all these extra genre games be made if they had a habit of flopping? In other words, would Nintendo make so many kinds of Mario games if they didn't sell so well?

And if the answer is no, why do you have a beef with the games being made, and not the consumers, who clearly want those games?