Metacritic is using VGC sales data !

[Seece]

steverhcp02 said:

yo_john117 said:

steverhcp02 said:

yo_john117 said:

I was mainly referring to Seece and his posting style, but just in general i remember the reputation this forum has, when people like FishyJoe wer ein charge,people dont necessarily understand distinction between admin.mod/reviewer colors of names but when people visit this site and see some posts from the aforementioned group it reflects poorly.

Im just saying i feel if someones going to contribute to the website then they should have a higher standard of posting.

Reputation is everything, not just of the reviewer but site credibility as a whole.

Well the thing is there is no such thing as unbiased...every single reviewer out there has at least some bias to them.

All the reviews I have seen from Vgchartz have been pretty good (and i'm not sure Seece even reviews games)

I think it just boils down to you not liking Seece, cause I think he's just a perfectly fine poster...there's nothing wrong with criticizing an idiot you know (as long as your not trolling or flaming them)

I understand bias. Im not even saying i dont enjoy the reviews here, if you refer to my first post i said i dont have a problem with them. I even feel Seece's reviews are spot on and great reads.

My main point is credibility. I feel its unfair for you to brush of my substance and say i just dont like Seece when you dont even know whether we have had interactions or anything. To a lot of us regulars we get a feel for posting styles and personalities. A lot of the ocntributors here were posters long before they were contributors. But they never really changed.

I guess i was just thinking via typing i just feel the place has always never gotten the respects its deserved because a lot of the people that are contributors dont act professionally in the forums or even in some articles. There was even an incident involving neogaf which i wont mention because i was threatened to be permabanned for talking about how unprofessional i thought it was....and it reflects poorly on the site as a whole

VGC is finally getting recognized like it should but some things i feel are limiting the exposure.

The majority of my "outspoken" posts, I do check with at least one mod (normally head mod himself) if it's ok to post, if it isn't I tone it down or simply don't post it at all.

I never break any rules, I just get into heated debates/discussion. I don't see anything wrong with that personally, though I will admit I need to stop focusing on petty arguments with certain users, the majority are now blocked and as long as they leave me alone I'll try hard to keep away.

That said, I don't think Meta cares about arguments from staff, more so pathetic insults against his website like "metadarlings" ...

that was just .. ugh