steverhcp02 said:
yo_john117 said:
steverhcp02 said:
I was mainly referring to Seece and his posting style, but just in general i remember the reputation this forum has, when people like FishyJoe wer ein charge,people dont necessarily understand distinction between admin.mod/reviewer colors of names but when people visit this site and see some posts from the aforementioned group it reflects poorly.
Im just saying i feel if someones going to contribute to the website then they should have a higher standard of posting.
Reputation is everything, not just of the reviewer but site credibility as a whole.
|
Well the thing is there is no such thing as unbiased...every single reviewer out there has at least some bias to them.
All the reviews I have seen from Vgchartz have been pretty good (and i'm not sure Seece even reviews games)
I think it just boils down to you not liking Seece, cause I think he's just a perfectly fine poster...there's nothing wrong with criticizing an idiot you know (as long as your not trolling or flaming them)
|
I understand bias. Im not even saying i dont enjoy the reviews here, if you refer to my first post i said i dont have a problem with them. I even feel Seece's reviews are spot on and great reads.
My main point is credibility. I feel its unfair for you to brush of my substance and say i just dont like Seece when you dont even know whether we have had interactions or anything. To a lot of us regulars we get a feel for posting styles and personalities. A lot of the ocntributors here were posters long before they were contributors. But they never really changed.
I guess i was just thinking via typing i just feel the place has always never gotten the respects its deserved because a lot of the people that are contributors dont act professionally in the forums or even in some articles. There was even an incident involving neogaf which i wont mention because i was threatened to be permabanned for talking about how unprofessional i thought it was....and it reflects poorly on the site as a whole
VGC is finally getting recognized like it should but some things i feel are limiting the exposure.
|
I can see your point on credibility but I don't think most people who look at metacritic will go into the vgchartz forums and read regularly enough to get a opinion on the writers. And the contributers staff has improved a bunch in their posting styles imo.
