| Kynes said: So now selling assets because they aren't profitable means ditching 45nm. no they sold assets as they stopped reasearching and left the job to Toshiba.they still have the rights for a new factory also they planned to go to 32nm as you read,but that was delaying too much costing SONY more losses so they skipped it Where does it say in your link that selling their plants to Toshiba meant that they were abandoning 45nm? it doesn't as links are too old so i couldn't find it but i tried to explain it to you my link mentioned them working on 32nm when they didn't even do 45nm and were on 65nm at that time. now why would a company go straight for 32nm as they thought more costs will be cut than developing 45nm but as time progressed the results didn't come and they went back to 45nm in PS3 SLIMMER. and also if they were working on 32nm then why did they put 45nm in PS3 SLIM,because 45nm took less time Do you think any sane company leaves a chip 4 years intact? wht do you mean???????????????? So you know what the Moore's law means in semiconductor industry? it doesn't come in everywhere.not where company id doing their own thing.SONY tried to but failed that was the point Jumping 1 full node and 2 half nodes is a suicide. Never was Sony going to jump from 65nm to 32nm. they were.they thought more costs would be saved but 32nm took alot of time so they went back to 45nm,which i was trying to tell you And you should revise what you write, it doesn't make any sense. maybe you should read more and you will know the meaning or just follow simple news
i still didn't understand what had your earlier links had to do with this |
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
