Its time to admit it. PS3 will NEVER overtake 360.

[Solid_Snake4RD]

Kynes said:

Solid_Snake4RD said:

Kynes said:

32nm where? TSMC ditched it, Globalfoundries ditched it.

you really don't follow gaming news

 

they ditched it when PS3's were on 65nm and they directly tried to go to 32nm and skip 45nm(currently in PS3)

but then it was taking too much time and SONY's wanted it early so they abandend it and went back and did 45nm

 

YOU SHOULD REALLY FIRST CHEAK WHAT YOU ARE COMMNETING AND THEN SPEAK

WTF are you talking about???

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Globalfoundries-32nm-Bulk-Process-Canceled-139063.shtml

http://www.cdrinfo.com/sections/news/Details.aspx?NewsId=26392

what does that have to do with CELL being 32nm

You deserve a Ban. You only spread fud, don't know a shit of what you say, and you are only saying your wishful thinking. Please, grow up, and before writing stupid things, learn to read, and to provide links.

you telling me to grow up when you want whiining about wanting links for everything and not following news

Do you really think any foundy thought of skipping 45nm? Provide a link! Provide a link where it says it's Sony who convinced them to return to 45nm. Provide a link where it says they will make 32nm bulk for Sony. Do you know anything you write about? GROW UP, and don't invent things.

http://www.qj.net/qjnet/gadgets/sony-drops-cell-project-to-focus-on-32nm-microchip-technology.html

above you can see that they went to focus stright on 32nm but in 2008 when SONY couln't reduce price,they went bacl to 45nm in PS3 SLIM.now tell me if they went to 32nm then why did tehy put 45nm in PS3 SLIM,cause it was casuing delay.if they hadn't canceld then we would haveseen 32nm,wouldn't we?

now please don't ask me to post any links as 2 yeats old stories don't easily come forward when searching and follow news

The sad thing is that probably you believe all the stupidities you write.

the sad thing is that you believe other believe in stupidities but you urslef do and not others