vlad321 said:
nightsurge said:
vlad321 said:
nightsurge said:
vlad321 said:
nightsurge said:
Not true at all. PC failure rate is quite extensively higher. This is due to the fact that PCs are configured by millions of combinations of custom parts that each have their own failure rate and when a single piece fails the whole system is then broken for the time being. With consoles they use a very select few parts that are refined and manufactured at a much larger scale.
|
Cut it whicever way you want the 360 RROD problem has a much higher chance of happening than anything that can ail a PC.
|
Nope. Not by a long shot. Especially since the RROD on Jasper and the new 360 revision failure rates are well in line with electronic standards of 3% or less. PC's on the other hand have a 30-60% failure rate within 3 years.
|
That's actually a full of shit statistic. The only way you could get a PC to fall apart within 3 years is if you boght a notebook from Dell between 2003 and 2005.
|
Lol, no it is quite a realistic and supported statistic. The one you just said, though, is "full of shit".
http://www.squaretrade.com/htm/pdf/SquareTrade_laptop_reliability_1109.pdf
|
So... laptop data? Any actual PC data to back up your claim or no?
|
Not anything that recent that I could find with a quick google search. Probably because laptops are far outselling desktops these days.
Any data whatsoever to backup your claims? I'd especially like to see RROD data on Jasper or newer 360s and data on Desktop PC's having a 0% failure rate within 3 years.