By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Gnizmo said:

Your prediction was 80k max. Regardless of it being a mistake, or not thats what it was. I am getting tired of typing this out though. VGchartz is only accurate to within 15%

we make the prediction on VGC numbers and not Famitsu,if you want to do that then go to neogaf

 

This is the official stance. 15% over 87k is 100.05k or over 100k.

now you are just simply bullshiting

That is to say it is entirely possible that the game actually did sell over 100k but the margin of error missed it.

no it didn't

and you are now saying that VGC made an error and so did other famitsu,mediacrate,etc and it can be over 100k...............lmao

Further VGC represents the lowest of the sales numbers so far. The average between all of them is roughly 92k which is much closer to possibly breaking 100k than it is to 80k max.

again follow VGC here and not others.

that ways VGC is wrong for many things but we still take VGC numbers

The reason predictions like your can be seen as fanboyism is because you intentionally low balled it by quite a lot while simultaneously downplaying a realistic prediction.

how the heel is it intentionally low.again you are bullshiting and this is what i called attcking as you intervene in somebody's discussion and then bullshit

Breaking 100k wouldn't have even been shocking given the first day numbers.

it wouldn't but it most likely wouldn't do that numbers.Capcm didn't expect it either

I put it out there as I cannot fathom why someone would try to claim otherwise. Japan sales 101 says you get a 50% boost over first day for a MH type game.

Japan sales 101.........................................LOL

you whould wite a book named that,we will make a prediction on its sales

50% boost on MH games that you talk about are also on PSP,wii platforms.so not comparable

Beyond that though, no one actual predicted over 100k. To quote "MHF has a pretty decent sell through, can it top 100k?"

and i was discussing and you intervened

Your entire argument has revolved around mis-characterizing the other side. It is sad to see someone have to go resort to such underhanded and deceptive tactics to make an imaginary point.

Deceptive.............................rofl