highwaystar101 said:
I'm sorry but your logic doesn't work. By your reasoning an theory can't be valid unless it answers 100% of the questions posed to it. Well I've got news for you, the world doesn't work like that, and if that were the case you would have dismiss pretty much all science. Science is the search for an answer, and something like most fields of science evolution doesn't have a simple answer for everything; so we have to research, find and interpret evidence, and discover the answer; this has been an ongoing process for the last 150 years. No one is going to say the current model of evolution is 100% complete, and I'm sure everyone will happily admit that there are things we just don't know about. What we do know is that a lot of evidence supports the theory of evolution, we know it has happened and we know it is happening. We can't explain all the details, but more than enough evidence exists to show that it does happen. Applying your logic to another situation could be done with gravity. We know gravity exists, but don't know everything about it (not by a long shot). Does this mean that gravity doesn't exist because we don't know everything about it, despite enough evidence existing to prove its existence? No. Of course not. Yet you've applied this same logic to evolution. |
In my opinion you have a restricted view on reality.
So just because science is limited because of technological reasons, time, physical reality and whatever, you just resign and stop to ponder about our existense?
I don't work like that.
I have reasons to believe in a God, based on stuff we've gone through before and other stuff I haven't told you.
A human individual makes up his or her world view through experience, knowledge, observation and by logically putting it all together in your intellect, okay?
I can't wait for the 1000th monkey skeleton to be found which would prove beyond reasonable doubt that we in fact evolved from slime, through chimps to humans without any unnatural events or divine intervention, and meanwhile just "trust" the palenthological community based on a few fracture skulls and rely on their human error and bias. I'll be long dead by then.
Same with these what I choose to call "mysteries", unanswered phenomenons of reality that are very important in existential thinking and your world view. (big bang, something-out-of-nothing, the concept of the conscious mind, abiogenesis, absolute morals, etc etc all these questions that science has no answers to).
I simply can't wait for "hard" evidence for the above important phenomenons, I have to make up my world view now, based on the knowledge I have, the knowledge that we have today. And my conclusions are that God exists, he is reveled through Jesus and the current evolution theory doesn't fit very well with that. And without hard proof I have no strong reasons to believe in something that contradicts the rest of my world view.