By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Solid_Snake4RD said:
Farmageddon said:

I'm not saying you didn't read it, but that you completelly ignored the main point of my question:

Why should their profits be discussed without counting R&D?

Look up there, you only answered to the italic part of my post. See?


their profits are not disscussed without R&D but their R&D is low so their profits are more

in my post i answered what i meant from my maint post so what i meant was if

sony profited $2b in PS2 era,they would easily put $1b in r&d and other departments profits show $1b

for nintendo,in GC era if they profited $2B they would invest around $300m so their profits show $1.7b

I know what you mean, but that was not my question. My question was why is that relevant at all, because, the way I see it, it's not.