Jereel Hunter said:
You're so good at refuting things that were never said. I never stated that piracy stopped their games from selling. However, since you bring it up, they sold 11m copies, but I'd be shocked if less than 25m people played the game. Looking at WC3, the sheer number of illegal copies being used on alternate servers like G-Arena is staggering. I remember I used to log on to play Dota, and anytime blizzard released a patch, if you DLed it, you'd not find a game for weeks, because all of the pirated copies would be using the older version. And just this one service accounted for thousands of users playing dota at any given time. When the server had issues, I was shocked to find that half my friends couldn't log onto b.net to play due to having illegal copies. It was (is) very widespread. Now, blizzard sells enough that they do just fine DESPITE it, but that doesn't mean they want to encourage it. And especially now that virtually all players can have as good an experience via b.net as they could over a LAN, blizzard is unlikely to add it later. Speaking of posts being so full of fail (something you are clearly well versed in), my statement was actually fact. Blizzard has no intention of implementing LAN because, as they have stated, they consider it unnessecary. Most of those who would need to take advantage of it would do so to circumvent b.net authentication. I always enjoy when you, instead of arguing with the point someone made, make up a point of your own to attack instead. |
I'd love some numbers to back up your 25m number there. Seeing Garena is not even an eighth of the people on the legit Bnet in WC3. All in all you are just guessing and have absolutely zero data to back it up. Meanwhileboth the US and Dutch governments have come to their senses to show that anyone who says that piracy causes loses of sales are liars and idiots.
You keep on failing. The you explicitly stated that only pirates use LAN, hence LAN is not implemented. Which is completely ignorant and clueless statement, one full of fail. LAN is he easiest way to connect two cimputers and play, all you need is a switch and you are done. Furthermore, for tournaments there is no other way to have lag that is in the acceptable levels. I can tell you for a fact that Bnet 2.0 did NOT have under 100 ping. I have the second best badnwidth in the US, second to the Pentagon, and I would still get 300 ping during the heavier imes of day. So no, LAN is absolutely needed for many many reasons, and say otherwise is a lie, ignorance, or idiocy. Choose one or more that apply to you.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835








