It's not really a total sim, looks arcady, but looks a lot of fun. And InsideSimRacing spent a hell of a lot of time playing Arcade racers (Grid etc) and they aren't any more credible than the next guy. (They try to make out that they are credible because they've driven racing cars - so have I and many others, what's the difference?).
I'm not sure i'l get it, it really depends on how much F1 variety GT5 will have because it is ultimately the best F1 car experience for realism fans. (Selnor is no doubt going to argue but look on Youtube and you will find split screen videos of GT5P and Massa - both taking the exact same racing lines and braking zones and ending up with lap times within 0.1s of each other - being that close to real life is what simulation is). But I'l probably end up getting this because it looks great fun, it has all the F1 tracks and up-to-date teams, and the weather effects look great in it.
Btw This is more an arcade racer (that's not a bad thing, they are generally more fun!) and yet you start spouting about marble effects etc. This game is fun, awesome, great...sure, but as usual Selnor you are being aggravating and hyping it up as something it isn't.
And also note how poor visually the game looks compared to screenshots - Lol, I've seen that happen before. It looks very nice though and I'm not a graphics whore myself so I don't really care, but the bullshit shots I'm seeing nowadays is borderline illegal of being 'misinformation' lol.
When's it out btw???
