wick said:
DrJay said:
@Solid_Snake4RD
Again I ask: What is your point? You are saying Sony could have made a lot more profit if not for the R&D costs they incurred to develop PS3, Cell and Blu-ray.
You are saying Nintendo would not have survived if they spent their hand held profits just like Sony did into their R&D.
What this thread is all about is that Nintendo has an acute business acumen that prevented them from spending ridiculous amounts of R&D on such matters as more power, more realistic graphics, larger data formats, when their R&D showed that this is not what their customers (both core and expanded audience) wanted. True, if Nintendo spent their profits like Sony did, they may not have survived... but they weren't that stupid.
Tell me, of the two companies: Who received more bang for their buck as far as R&D costs go? We're not talking absolute amounts here as that doesn't matter. Who spent their money more wisely? Whose R&D bore more fruit? If the worst happened to both companies (Nintendo having several generations just like the gamecube or Sony having several generations like the PS3 and PSP) which company will likely survive?
|
Don't bother man. It's useless trying to explain logic and reasoning with him.
Yes Sony are the greatest and Nintendo know nothing about the business they've been in longer than any other company on the face of the earth.
Happy now??
|
explain logic and you are you are talking about it? - a man who says he does have time after 2 posts just because the other poster is 17years old....................LMAO