By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast on 21 June 2010
Edit Thread
RolStoppable said:
Slimebeast said:
disolitude said:

He is correct and slighly wrong at the same time.

360 can technically do exact same 3D as PS3. 1080p image - 720p per eye.

But theoretically PS3 can do 2160p - 1080p per eye due to HDMi 1.3 vs 1.2

However, considering that PS3 and 360 struggle to do a game in 1080p...rendering a game 2160p game is impossible for these consoles...unless that game is pong.

So yes, there is no reason why 360 can't do 3D. Microsoft doesn't sell TVs however, so they really have no reason to push the tech.

Those numbers don't add up. Two 720p images don't equal one 1080p image.

Isn't it more like, one image 720p at 30frames per second and another image 720p at 30 frames per second and the combined image is 720p 30frames per second.

1 plus 1 is 1?

Well, I got confused and put it rong. I dunno why I felt the need to say that the end result is only 30 frames per second to each eye which the other eye can't see and vice versa (because of shutter glasses). But yes, the machine must be able to output 60 frames per second, so 1 plus 1 is 2.

But still, two 720p images dont equal one 1080 image and two 1080p frames definately don't equal one 2160p frame.