| ZenfoldorVGI said:
Honestly, how can 3D be imprecise? This is PR spin. Sony's "research" is bullshit, because if they really did research on it, they would be the ones with awesome new hardware. He, and you, need to read some reviews on the 3DS's 3D tech. Sony's research on Nintendo's technology amounts to them watching the Nintendo E3 press conference, shitting their pants, and brainstorming some way to marginalize the blow, all the while drawing up plans to copy it with the PSP, and somehow proclaim that their version is better, despite the obvious fact that it will be a complete and utter ripoff trying to cash in on the vast vast success of the 3DS....kinda like the move did. |
A lot of it is probably in the translation, but autostereoscopic 3D today could be considered "imprecise" in several ways:
- lenticular screens suffer from fringing and colour aberrations in some viewing conditions (depending on viewing angle and side lighting)
- parallax barrier screens have halved horizontal resolution, and basically have half the dpi of a good portable screen such as the ones in smart phones
Now, it's obvious that with this kind of talk they are just trying to soften the blow of N showing their 3d device first. But to think that Sony hasn't been conducting R&D with autostereoscopic small displays when these have been around for a couple of years is very naive.
