Roma said:
<!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> Eh lol hahaha you know that was so stupid of you to do sorry but that is the truth lol
If you use pics it is obvious that no one will be able to tell how the game-play is different than the other… WOW
OoT and MM are very different in game-play both of them use time travel but in a different way. The later lets you play three days only in which you have to go back in time to change things you can do the days after.
WW used the sea and TP did not have time travel so it makes it different than the other games before it. sure they all use the same fighting and dongeon system with improvements here and there.
What kind of change do people want? A Zelda racer, golf, soccer? It is an adventure game and if you do not like it then by something ells that is why we humans have the ability to chose lol.
You don’t like you don’t buy that is how easy it is so live with it.
For me I have a problem with how low polly things seem to be in SS but they said they are going to fix things so I am happy and even if it does not look as good as I hoped for I am more interested in the way it plays as I have always loved Zelda since OoT |
and zerg use overlords and need to use up a drone when they make a building, and terran buildings can fly, and protoss don't need to use a worker to build a building at all.
But it's all the same game isn't it?
Even miyamoto referred to wind waker as different and that zelda was becoming stale, as I do. How am I so wrong?
