Analysts are right and wrong. They work well when predicting business and products that follow the standard developmental pattern. ie remaking the same product as before just better.
Analysts break down 90% of the time when a business doesn't follow the standard pattern. The other 10% was just a lucky guess. Nintendo isn't designing anymore under the concept of remake better. They are making under the design of make for a consumer purpose. This type of analysts require newer styles of business school not old business school. Business school with more consumer psychology.
So this person is wrong. They are assuming that people will buy a better product for more money just because it's better. We saw how well that went with the PS3 didn't we.
Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.
