Rath said:
smargavio said:
That seems like a low number compared to the amount of detail (number of cars etc.), how good it looks, and how long it took to finally finish. I mean Red Dead Redemption cost $80m and it looks great but not photo-realistic like GT5. Makes me think Rockstar charged themselves too much. Actually getting excited for GT5 now, though we have a release date.
|
Either Rockstar is doing hollywood accounting (which I wouldn't discount) or Sony is doing the opposite.
|
Yeah, I wouldn't discount that, either. Especially considering GT5 had to be build on an engine from scratch. Somebody is cooking the books over at Rockstar San Diego.