| Rpruett said: There has been a lot of talk about it but the OP's intention (IMO) was to say that Zelda and the stage presentation really didn't seem to do anything for him. It didn't seem revolutionary (Like many had hoped), it didn't seem overly epic (like many had hoped), the controls didn't even work well (Like many had hoped)....I think the OP acknowledged the fact that Zelda is Zelda and the chances of it being a poor game are slim. But I believe he was making reference to the fact that from the stage presentations, Sorcery did look better. Not just graphically, but gameplay wise as well. I would agree with that. I think the OP also acknowledged that it's unlikely that this game is actually better than Zelda but from what we have seen thus far it was his impression. |
This man gets the point of the thread.
4 ≈ One
