By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 16 June 2010
Edit Thread
Acevil said:
theprof00 said:
Gnizmo said:
theprof00 said:

Oh ok, so you judged me by my OP and nothing else. Well, I'll judge you by your avatar. You live 20 years ago and have no relevance to my thread. good day.


The original post, which sets the tone and topic of conversation for the entire thread, doesn't represent what your thread is about? Seriously? Thats just, wow.

I tend to agree with the idea presented here. Anyone who can't objectively rate games show their biases easily. More specifically they crap on good games needlessly, or refuse to admit faults of the games they own. It is easy to identify them though, and simply not reply.

Didn't realize I was being judged for 1% of what I show. I'll be more careful to write very good OPs followed by gobbledeguk and see what changes.

It wasn't exactly what you said in the op that made me lose respect for you, it was the attitude you showed to everyone in the thread that did it. The whole thread from your point of view, seems like lets bash zelda for not being original. 

I don't like Sorcery, but I shouldn't have discounted it in the early stages, and that is my fault... I will admit it, but if you see nothing wrong with your posts, than I am surprised. 

It just got out of control. In fact, the first time I mentioned it lacking originality was the same post in which I said sorcery didn't wow me.

I was explaining that sorcery didn't deserve praise, but it showed more than zelda did. My evidence being that zelda brought nothing to the table, and that the two were very similar in mechanics. That's a justifiable point. An established franchise with nothing new and predictable gameplay VS a new IP with lots of potential. I also wrote in the OP "is it just me?" For some people, people like myself, potential is more interesting than predictable great performance. In the end, Zelda will end up with better scores, but it's exciting to talk about the potential of a game.

That's hard to do when every Nintendo fan shows up and mocks/derails the thread and things go haywire. I wrote a post to Rol and all he commented on was that I wrote "weekend" instead of "event". It's a two-way street ace. Don't think it was just me attacking zelda. There was a lot of steering taking place. Keep in mind I said zelda would be the better game a good 8-9 times.