Soriku said:
Slimebeast said:
Soriku said:
Slimebeast said:
Nintendo sure won. They crushed everything.
Now I dunno if this is the right thread for it, but Zelda motion controls didnt look anywhere near 1:1. There was a noticable, and for me game-breaking, lag. Graphically too, I was underwhelmed. Damn, Im almost upset because it didnt give me the epic moment I was hoping for.
Epic Mickey looked awesome though.
And obviously DK Country is gonna rock.
I didnt catch if that Kirby game was for DS or Wii. Hopefully the Wii. It looked cute. But maybe it was meant for smaller children, not grown up men like me??
|
Did you see the Kotaku video of Zelda? http://kotaku.com/5564197/the-legend-of-zelda-skyward-sword-video-preview-starring-me The impressions from other people say the controls are good.
Also Kirby is for the Wii...and there's no such thing as a "grown up" Kirby.
|
I watched that video. I hope I can get acustomed to it, but I really hate lag...
So u mean all kirby games are for children?
|
I don't mean Kirby games are for children because many adults play Kirby too of course. It's just...you're probably judging the game on the art style right? Well Kirby isn't a game that is expected to have a mature type of art style.
|
Art style... yes and no. Mario has a kiddy art style but it can be played by adults too. The smalles kids cant even handle Mario games, right?
But as in.. u know Nintendogs. Nintendogs is intentionally made for really small kids. Even a 4 year old can play it right? Viva Pinata is also for very young kids (I think lol), like pre-school and up.
So compared to the above, where does Kirby stand? I mean the new game looked like a platform game where u pick gold stars much like in Mario. But is this Kirby game like a very easy and simple Mario Bros Wii?
