RolStoppable said:
If the content is similar, graphics become a differentiating factor. There are many WWII, sci-fi or postapocalyptic shooters in the market place. Is it just a coincidence that the best looking games usually sell the most? Of course those games also get backed up by the biggest ad campaigns, but that's how it works. Games with big development budgets naturally will have great graphics and since they are supposed to sell a lot to make a profit, they also get a lot of marketing. Those GTA games were sidestories released on the PSP and later on on the PS2 as the fourth and fifth iteration on Sony's home console, respectively. I don't think they are the best example for your argument, but I agree that content does indeed play an important role for the sales of a game. So a FPS needs good multiplayer, graphics, content and marketing. Goldeneye will have at the very least the content covered, so much is clear. |
What makes you think those are the best looking games? Last I checked Crysis is the best looking FPS ever, from all accounts, and that didn't help it.
And what if it is a coincidence? By you just assming graphics sell a game, you're supporting the very mindset that has been denying the Wii the support it's been deserving since the system was announced.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








