c0rd said:
Alright, last time I'll comment on the MH3 deal (sorry if it's somewhat off topic): I brought the game up as an example of what not to do if a third party wants their Wii game to be truly successful - essentially putting a PS2 game with better graphics on the Wii. If they made room for worthy changes, like motion combat, improved interface, maybe 2p online co-op (see MKWii), the game could have really taken off. Instead, we see sales as they are - good, but nothing special. Nobody said the game should've been a PS3/360 multiplat, either. I was saying the sales would definitely have been higher in the west if it were, because again, it's essentially a last-gen game with improved graphics and online (hello, perfect HD game formula). I think it's silly to believe the Wii could compete with a smaller userbase (61m vs ~68m), and with a game that was built with the HD consoles' values in mind, instead of what the Wii stands for. Hell, the game comes packaged with what's essentially a Playstation controller... Finally (to LTNK), I already stated I didn't think MH3 should have been on the HD consoles, due to development costs, incentives (Nintendo's MH3 promotion), and most notably, Japan. Still, I brought the game up to illustrate why it seems 3rd party games don't sell as well on the Wii (big budget or not), as they do on the HD consoles - it's because 3rd parties don't utilize the Wii's strengths. |
Oh, I wasn't addressing you cord. The things you said previously were legitimate, I agreed with ya.
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."







