Rpruett said:
Vertigo-X said:
Rpruett said:
Final Fantasy (13 yDo I expect Nintendo to change their style? No. Do I expect them to make Mario adult? Gory? No. Do I expect them to do something that makes me say 'Wow! I really need to get that Mario....it looks like they've done a lot to it!'. Yes I do. Mario for SNES did that. Mario for N64 did that. No Mario since has done that. Gravity doesn't impress me. Every game incorporates some form of gravity nowadays. Do these great 'gameplay' innovations include keeping the same jumping mechanics fourteen years later? Or adding a bumble bee costume instead of Flower power? Come on now.
Nintendo has the nostalgia angle that Morgan Webb mentioned. I bought Super Mario Galaxy 1 based off of hype, ratings, reviews and nostalgia. "Well it is a Mario game..". After I completed Mario Galaxy, I said "I won't be fooled again Nintendo". Same thing after Super Smash Brothers on Wii. They need some fresh ideas not re-hashed ideas from 1996.
|
Super Mario - 25 years ago
Super Mario - Present
Oh, hey, look! I can do that too!
...
You know that's not much of an argument...
|
Sure it is.
Mario has progressed in 25 years. What I have mentioned is the stagnation of the series since the original 3D Mario hit the scene. I showed several other series which have in most cases really changed a lot in 13-14 years.
|
I'm not sure what you're talking about.. Mario Galaxy 2 is actually a lot different than Mario 64. Besides the obvious change in environment, there are much more varied levels, each with their own unique features, physics, gravity, etc. The stages are more linear, and less open world. The graphics are much better, new music many new enemies and powerups, motion controls. Really the only thing similar to Mario 64 is the fact that you collect stars. But the similarities pretty much end there.
