By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Alic0004 on 05 June 2010
Edit Thread
dunno001 said:
makingmusic476 said:

It's obviously a joke.  Hence the mention of Chuck Rock and Bubsy, two third party characters that saw their heyday during the NES era right alongside Kid Icarus.

Kinda ironic that some people are laughing at Game Informer's supposed ignorance on this one.  I can see lambasting them for a considerably weak attempt at humor, but ignorant they are not.  At least not in this instance.

Then I take it your factual "inaccuracies" are also supposed to be a joke? Neither of those characters were released on the NES, rather, they were on the SNES. But they were not Nintendo icons like the article claims, either, both were whored out to so many different systems that it's not funny. (Chuck Rock's start was on the Amiga, and Bubsy was simultaneously on the Genesis, Jaguar, and I believe something else alongside the SNES release.)

I'm sorry, but if this article is not ignorance, it's trolling. Neither of which should have been allowed by a competent staff, especially for things so verifyable. And if you're trying to anger people, that's even worse. For a magazine that tries time and time again to say they're not biased, they sure need to work on it. Actions speak louder than words, and the bias in their actions is impossible to ignore.


It's actually funnier if you get that Bubsy is a slightly more recent character than Kid Icarus.  The article is basically saying, "come on, Nintendo, are you really going to use a character almost two decades old and not make us a new game, so normal people who don't fact check their game on Wikipedia actually know who the guy is?"

How is that trolling anyone?  They're saying they want a new game in the series, and that it's been a really long time.

 

Also, I wouldn't take it too hard that Makingmusic doesn't remember as far back as Kid Icarus.  He had the distinct disadvantage of not being born yet.