I must say that am rather sick of the conception that because a direct sequel goes with the same formula as it's previous iteration, it is the same game again. I find it rather beclouding, ignorant and truthfully, very infuriating how some people can be so blind to the clear differences between some titles, and try to use this dreadfully inaccurate sense with the intent of trying to lower people's opinions of the title, including their own - especially when oftentimes they may not have even played the game for a respectful period of time, if at all.
Modern Warfare 2 is not the same as Call of Duty 4, it's a completely different game, it has a different campaign, Spec Ops - an entirely new game mode - more online multiplayer modes and maps. Super Mario Galaxy 2 has introduced numerous new gameplay mechanics and a host of new worlds to traverse, alongside addressing the gameplay issues of its predecessor to create a brand new experience. These games are outstanding. One may not be so fond of the gameplay formula of these titles, which i concede is fair enough, however this does not indicate that the title itself is at serious fault, but rather the player is unwilling to bear an open mind, and it really shows when they have no concrete reason for why the game is flawed other than It's just the same game again. Honestly, some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
How technical is your game?
