By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Munkeh111 on 03 June 2010
Edit Thread
Kasz216 said:
Munkeh111 said:

Because Jim wants to play the game that they made. It is not about a physical thing, but it is about a piece of software really.

Of course you don't have to pay for the pasta, because the prodcut has partially been used up, a game is not used up, you get the same things that you would if you bought the game new, except for EA. And so if you want to compare it to you eating some pasta, then actually EA's deal seems fair if you are not going to get the full dish, you can just have what is left

Ok, instead of Pasta... it's a TV.  There, the product isn't "partially usesd up". 

According to you, Jim owe's Panasonic some money. 

If you think it's fair... I think you have a pretty warped world view... where companys BENEFIT from having games people buy but don't want.... and therefore give away.

In effect, benefit by making shitty games or misreprestenting the games they sell.


They don't benefit from you selling the game, they benefit from somebody else buying the game. You take the game up to the counter, and say "I would like to buy Uncharted 2" and they will offer you a used copy. Now you are saying, if you buy that game used, so money doesn't go to Sony, it goes to gamestop. I don't see why you want gamestop having the money.

They are not benefiting from people not wanting the game, they are benefiting from people buying the game. It is notthing to do with it being a bad game, people still want to buy the game, but they are just going to buy it used, because they get the same features, but for cheaper.