TWRoO said: If we are talking hardware quality, GC pwns all of this and last gens home consoles.
None of the above however manages to affect the sales much... sales are down to games and marketing for the most part. |
You can't just add that together like design is as important as hardware capabilities. For the first, the design is a personal subject. I, for example, think that PS2 Slim doesn't look well at all, it's just a practical design. It's no question for me that the Xbox was better in this spot. By the way, do you look on the console or the screen when you play? The hardware capabilities are more important than all other spots together! (maybe not controller capabilities). And, the small Xbox controller is the best ever made (the 360 controller doesn't have the White and Black buttons). I'd say that the GC controller is the worst. It almost looks like a toy. REMEMBER: The more buttons, the higher possibility!
Why was the PS2 so popular then? IT'S CHEAPER!!! Many of my friends that bought a PS2 like 4 years ago wanted to change to an Xbox some weeks later. They thought that the difference in tech specs was less than the difference in price. The Xbox was clearly the best old-gen console, like the PS3 is now. The reason because the PS3 is so unpopular right now is the PRICE!!!
Sony earned enough with money on the PS1&2 to be able to make some high spec consoles, like PSP and PS3. Microsoft and Nintendo earned too few money, so they had to do worse consoles now!
You know why Oddworld just went on the Xbox? Because of the graphics! It was planned to be a PS2 exclusive, but the console was too crappy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The PS2 is clearly too overrated...