ameratsu said:
it's funny you say that. i'd fire the people responsible for the abysmal failure rate. Which ties directly into marketing, business planning and quality perception.
RSEagle said: I'm not japanese nor do I live in europe, but i go with what i know to be good. For example, I will only buy japanese cars. That's all i've ever owned and they've good to me so why would i even consider something else? same idea for game consoles. i think it goes beyond being an american company. better quality perception and games might help.
|
I fired those people in my last rant... now I'm moving up to upper management ... ;)
I agree with the quality perceptions, even though its been addressed and corrected with the new units and 3 year warranty. Again, I believe its a failure in the management to not have addressed that to their customers.
Oh and your wrong on the games department, the 360 has a higher quality and more diverse library then the other 2 systems.
| afree_account said: rukusa said:
One really f-ed up bad assumption.
I think it's the other way around. NA buys alot xboxes, cause it's made from an NA company. |
Wrong... for the simple fact that the NA company is Microsoft. No one likes Microsoft, even MS knows that no one likes Microsoft. Look at the 360 boxes, you won't find the word Microsoft other then in small print on the back. And let's not forget that 99% of us in NA where raised on Japanese consoles.
ssj12 said:
so Nintendo and Microsoft both sold over 7.5 million consoles in one week? thats the only way Sony would lose 19% of it's market. |
You misunderstood him, he meant going back to 18% share... also your comment doesn't add up.
Sony will go back to 18% if their sell ratio for NA and Japan is less then 0.9:5 against Nin and MS combined.
Example - Sony NA/Japan Sells 500k combined, then Wii+360 would need to sell 2,770k for Sony to go back to 18% (18.8% to be exact)
Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)








