Squilliam on 30 May 2010
Greenpeace are full of themselves really. Half of the criteria don't particularly apply to different companies.
For instance What would Microsoft take back from consumers aside from an RROD Xbox 360? Most of their goods are distributed on discs or with computers.
Also why would Nintendo need to have a stated position on climate change?! Furthermore why would they get a 'somewhat bad' rating for energy efficiency of their new models when they have class leading energy efficiency!
Full report: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/toxics/2010/ranking%20tables%20may%202010-all.pdf
Its kinda full of itself in many ways.
Tease.
