stof said:
What would the point of all 10 editors doing their own 10 best games list be if they were all supposed to be the same? Of course they were supposed to be subjective personal 10 best games lists. |
They don't have to be exactly the same but they should still show some "loooking outside of yourself." It's basically what you are supposed to do in an industry when you have a magazine like that. I mean it's like Game reviews. You are reviewing the game. You arn't saying how much YOU enjoyed it. It's how much you think other people will enjoy it. I don't think it's a conspiracy or something silly like that. It's just poor form and unproffesional. It's like if someone asked you "Who were the biggest bands of 2007". Would you list off your favorite bands? Or would you list off the bands you heard the most on the radio and that won awards?








