By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pizzahut451 said:
Viper1 said:
pizzahut451 said:

And yes, Nintendo asked them to make a CD drive for SNES, but then they screwed them over and went to Philips, and for some reason they sticked to the cartidges. After they saw the success of PlayStation they made their systems disc based, even though they ripped on them in SNES era. Yup, a typicall Classical Greek philisophers

Wrong and I just explained all that in the post directly above yours.

so let me get this straight. Philips can use Nintendo IPs on their console (i think it was called CD-i or something, they had 3 Zelda games and Hotel Mario, all games flopped) but Sony cant??? Well guess what Nintendo, Philips isnt the one who kicked your ass 2 gens straight.

 

I hope dealing with Philips payed off for them...

Yes, as part of the initial aggreement with Philips, they licensed out some of their IP's.  But what does that have to do with Sony?   What does that have to do with the proceeding generations?  

You've completely mixed facts with fanboy ego.   The entire point of your post was to smear Nintendo for not allowing Sony to take over as brand holder and publisher of Nintendo software.

 

But if you want to play that game....who made more profits in 2009 than the other one's entire video game history?



The rEVOLution is not being televised