Samus Aran said:
Cause the Western peace is so much better right? You know except for the fact we're destroying our world and the south is paying for all the ecological and social costs while the north is leeching from their back. With north I mean Europa/USA and with south I mean mostly Africa, but south america and parts of Asia as well. Because of our global economical system 9 million people die of starvation each year in AFRICA alone. It's destroying the local agriculture which is/was the primary source of survival for many people in the world. A lot of people will die for our global economical system. A lot. |
A. Are you suggesting that if president Ahmadinejad conquers the world through a bloody genocidal war, all of that would stop? Is a better system of peace "do as we say or you will die"?
B. I know that the world is unbalanced and we are causing vast amounts of damage to it and exploiting the poor. But I fail to see how that has anything to do with trying to reason that their way of achieving peace through threats and violence to force conformity is better than our way of achieving peace through diplomacy, with violence most often being a last resort.
