Squilliam on 27 May 2010
How inefficient and wasteful. That extra performance cost them an arm and a leg and hasn't been used by more than a fraction of the game library. So yay for a machine which cost another $200 too much at launch in order for games that at most 10% of the PS3 population will buy and then appreciate that difference. Good old Sony, its definately money not well spent.
Tease.
