PS3 still not maxed out, says Sony

[disolitude]

CGI-Quality said:

CommonMan said:

Rpruett said:

Garnett said:

Ldn.se said:
How times have changed...threads like that would create a war 2 yrs ago. Now the true Xbox fans are a rarity here like endangered species.

lol, Us Xbox fans have given up.

I think this is because you can't fight about much.  The PS3 clearly produces the better looking games.   Numerous games have proven as much.  

"Better looking" is subjective, please clarify. I disagree wholeheartedly with this statement.

OT: I really want someone to come out and say, "Well, that's all she wrote, nuthin's gonna look better than that last game", that would be epic.

Of course it is subjective, but widely acknowledeged throughout the industry. In the end, it won't make a difference, but right now, my opinion as well, PS3 games have the edge.

To the topic, I would think all of the consoles this gen have some wiggle room left to explore.

 

All I know is that apparently PS3 has 3 high budet exclusives which look better than anything on the xbox360. Even if one wanted to see how much better PS3 is, they can't...as these games are not on the 360. I also know is that every time I see a game on both consoles I can't tell the difference.

Now people here always argue that this is because of bad programmers, 360 ports....etc. But doesn't it then make sence that those 3 PS3 exclusives are amazing looking because of good programmers?

See the faulty thinking here...

Red dead redemption on PS3 is 640p and on 360 is 720p = bad developer

while

Uncharted 2 is way better than anything on the 360 because PS3 hardware is much more powerful than 360...not cause maybe Naughty Dog may be good for squeezing great visuals out of a console.

Besides, do these minor differences in visuals really matter? Entire last gen graphics on most Gamecube and Xbox made their PS2 games counterpart look like their retarded cousin...but no one will argue that PS2 was the console to get last gen.