Does anyone think PS3 can realistically get to second place?

[nightsurge]

MikeB said:
@ nightsurge

That was Sony, I believe. You know, with all those lame charts claiming people HAD to buy all this extra stuff to show the 360 was more expensive than their $600 machine.

They didn't say you have to.

That chart is rather informative. The 499 dollar PS3 came with a default harddrive, Blu-Ray drive, Wi-Fi built-in, BlueTooth, free online gaming and HDMI out of the box.

Many 360 owners upgraded to a new 360 just for HDMI. There are people who didn't realize the 360 does not have WiFi, some go like "WTF, even my DS has WiFi built-in, how much did you say WiFi for the 360 costs? Double WTF..."

Obviously quite a few people care about the system. That line was pure trolling/flame bait.

Not that many. Considering all the anticipated exclusives Microsoft bought for Japan, the 360 performed quite miserably in Japan. That´s my opinion, that´s not trolling. Many would consider this to be a fact.

Milo presentations were not faked.

Sorry, but the original demo was faked. What was shown was scripted and not revolutionary as claimed.

Obviously the demo part that was a recorded video was scripted.  It was a recorded video!  It probably had many practice shoots until they got the final version done.  The demos that were live for all press events were not scripted and all the press said it worked as promised.

That chart isn't informative at all, either.  Also, you got something else wrong.  The PS3 $500 model didn't have WiFi either. 

You still haven't posted any links or anything to show just how MS was spreading propoganda and lies about competitors....

So please, take your misinformation elsewhere.

@jarrod - exactly.  So I guess not many people care about the PS3....