Slimebeast said:
Please put at least a little thought into this. Your examples were horrible and don't apply here, because in your scenarios the procedure of cirumcising the child has a purpose, some kind of gain. Instead think of a scenario where you have one guy in the woods alone with a baby. And he's got a hammer. There is no gain except for his own temporary pleasure. |
Seems like I put in more thought than you ever did.
You asked for a scenario where inflicting torture on a child could be considered a good thing, you got a few. Doesn't mean that torturing a child could be considered good in all given situations, nor does it mean that it couldn't be considered wrong in others.
Warning: The preceding message may or may not have included sarcasm, cynicism, irony, full stops, commas, slashes, words, letters, sentences, lines, quotes, flaeed gramar, cryptic metaphors or other means of annoying communication. Viewer discretion is/was strongly advised.







