CGI-Quality said:
I am actually curious, how is the PS3 (currently) doing "badly"? HAS it done badly, yes. HAS it lost tons of money, yes. IS it it in last place, yes. HAS it corrected any of it's early issues, yes. IS it up YoY, yes. IS it making money, apparently, some say yes, others say no. Perception is key. If you were to say the PS3 has had blunders, I would agree. Saying it currently isn't soing good, I'd disagree. In fact, if the PS3 is doing bad, and it's outselling the 360, what's that say about the 360? Is it doing miserably? I don't care for who's on what side, but I'm not sure how the PS3 is doing bad. |
You have to be kidding. You just said it yourself, the PS3 is doing bad. Heck, PS3s may still lose money if cost like salaries and advertisment and depreciation exceed the gross margin.It demands on what they are talking about, and that is never clear.
But let me put it into numbers: The last figures show the PS3s lost $18 a unit. Let's say the PS3 as at 34 million before all of them made money (NOTE:All PS3s sitting on shelves before the drop in production cost still lose money thanks to inventory keeping. Some PS3s shipped may still hold the sale loss on them). Multiply the two numbers together and you get a lose of $576,000,000. The system has lost 576 million dollars. Now this is just the last figure. The cheaper PS3s may not have been shipped which may mean they lost 612 million dollars. It could even be more as $18 was the last figure, and probably the lowest one. This is a low ball estimate. To add insult to injury, if Sony is using the FIFO inventory method, they will be losing money for Q2 and 3 despite the production being cheaper (this is one instance where LIFO yeilds a higher net income).
Sony also does not increase in demand. The two jumps past the Wii the system has ever had have been price cuts. The first was the initial and and the other was the Slim. The Slim fizzeled out quickely, so this method is going to be weaker and weaker. In other words, Sony has to cut profitability to sell more units. They can't make money on these units unless they sell. So what do they do? Sell few and hope to make a little earnings, or drop the price again and risk the system's unit price being under it's unit cost. Basically, there is no win here.
No to mention that Sony's first party developers do poorly. The best selling games on the PS3 are from third parties which have sold around 5 million I beleive. This is a far cry from Microsoft's 10 million and Nintendo's 40 million for their top game(s). Sony has to pray that third party developers can make the software to sell systems.
If you want to make this really bad, Sony's "shortage" has the system still under the Wii and 360 (also pointing that demand has stayed consitant the whole time). When the Wii was supply constraiting, they were outselling the compition and still sold for $600 on Ebay.
So now try saying with a straight face that the PS3 is not a failure. People are becoming disalussional.







