| thismeintiel said: This whole argument over the tech is pretty dumb. Especially, if the end result is the same thing. Just like the Wiimote and Move, it will give you the same end result, albiet Move is more accurate. Natal will give us the same end result as the PSEye. Though, I have concerns it won't be as accurate. And that is definitely not based on some Sony bias, but on every single vid and demo we have seen thus far. And the fact that most, if not all, those vids are from before the processor was removed doesn't help dispell those concerns. @ iron man You really shouldn't get yourself so hyped up for Natal. You may be setting yourself up for a huge letdown. Epsecially, if MS doesn't fix the accuracy issues, and if all the games turn out to be casual titles that are only fun for 20 mins. Besides, MS didn't invent Ricochet.
|
Starts at 0:35
Actually the argument is very valid, you're only saying it's dumb because the specific details of the technology show just how flawed the statement PS Eye can do what Natal can do is. The resource cost it would take on processing time to do a full body 3D skeletal capture on a person with the PS Eye would be ridiculous. The camera isn't capable of doing what Natal does in that regard and it certainly couldn't do it at 30FPS with as comparatively little latency as Natal.
You have ZERO evidence of the release version of Natal to be so negative with regards to accuracy, latency or indeed its software catalogue. You really should start being more gracious about Natal's tech because you're the one who could actually end up with egg on your face too. Natal isn't hyped on these boards, just irrationally hated upon by the way.
