ironman said:
joeorc said:
ironman said:
joeorc said:
Mr Puggsly said:
With the Eyetoy, could a 3D model be controlled by tracking your body or does it just sense where limbs are flailing? Also, can the Eyetoy see multiple people?
I've only seen a few Eyetoy games and most of them involve seeing your self smacking crap or making gestures. Is that all the Eyetoy was capable of?
The Eyetoy seems like a very limited device in comparison. |
for instance:
it does track your hand's motion because the controller is the reference point in a 3D space.
because it know's where the Move controller is, it know by reference where your hand is.
so if your hand move's forward or back or in any direction the camera track's the position of the remote and can trach your hand's movement.
like i stated it's not 3d tracking by sight but by the reference point of the controller in 3d space.
yes the eyetoy can see multiple people in 2D but in order to track in a 3D space it need's an object that would be it's reference point/ A lighted sphere work's best because the focus point of the lighted sphere. even the Wii motion tracking track's in a 3D space.
|
That's a software perception of a Z-plane and not a true Z plane. The camera is only capable of 2D tracking, it cannot physically see in 3D.
|
i am not saying it can see in 3D i am not saying that...I am saying it can track and object in 3d space, that by no mean's excludes the camera from tracking an object in 3D. just because it cannot see it does not mean it cannot track it!
|
No, the camera cannot track it. the software does, you just admitted that.
|
the software is made to interact with the camera with what the camera may see or here an it can relay the size measurement's distance the object is from the camera object is right and relay it's information back to where ever it need's too?
so if the camera is using the object as a reference point in space does it matter if it can seen the space around the object to track it?
or if it can see the object and it instead track's the object instead of the space around the object.
no because it's tracking the object and it's point in a space distance in A 3D AREA OF space what is in that space does not matter only the object it is tracking. this by math it know's the distance and where that object is inside of say a CUBE or sphere.
just because it cannot see into your space in 3D does not mean the camera is programed to alway's measeure it's data from a reference point of the controller in a 3D area of space.
just because it's not viewing the area around the object it's tracking does not mean it's not tracking it in a 3D SPACE.
