PS EYE can do what NATAL can:

[joeorc]

ironman said:

joeorc said:

ironman said:

joeorc said:

MARCUSDJACKSON said:

you two have me reading. why? interesting though.

because there is the argument that you have to have a 3d camera to track in true 3D which is not true.  that still does not mean the 2d camera could not track something in 3D space though, because it can.

It can use an object to track that object's position in a 3d space which is what the EYETOY does indeed do.

Ugh, fail, it's because there is an argument that a 2D camera can track in 3D...whit is physically impossible. It can only replicated, which is not TRUE 3D.

...like I stated it may not be able to track by sight @multiple angle's because there is no second camera, that still does not stop a 2D camera tracking an object in 3D space which the EYETOY DOES INDEED DO. THERE IS NO REPLICATION ABOUT IT.

IT IS TRACKING IN 3D.

 

 

No no no no!!!! The camera is NOT tracking in 3D. it is using software to gage where the object is based on size differances. That is artificial 3D, not true 3D. It has no Z Plane, only an X and a Y. 

it's not artificial.it track's an object in a 3D space, just because it cannot see the object by sight does not mean it does not see it's reference point in a 3D area of Space. you are trying to say in order for it to track in 3d it must do it by multiple camera angle's which is not true at all.

that's a fact man. look were going to keep going back an forth over this it does not make it any less true with what i am saying, hell like i stated the Wii track's motion in 3D space. just not by site!