joeorc said:
ironman said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
joeorc said:
ironman said:
FF_Fanatic said:
I wouldn't keep my hopes up if I were you. Move isn't going to sell that great.
|
|
|
neither is natal! they both suck. and by the way. your agurment is weak and isn't worht debaiting.
|
You'll eat those words. I guarantee. (Unless MS fails to gather in devs for this thing...which I don't see since many devs are excited about this.) Anyway, nice to see you taking the cheap way out. Just because you can't argue with common sense does not give you the right to say my argument is weak.
@ Joeorc
No, just no, in order for it to see in true 3D it needs a 2nd camera. It's REPLICATING 3D And it does it fairly well from what I've seen, but it is NOT on par with Natal, and it was seen as a gimmick since it didn't really have any good games. Thats why I say if Natal doesn't have games behind it, it will fail, but I don't think MS is going to let it go the way of the eye since they have invested so heavily in this. Also, Don't get me wrong Move is interesting and fairly innovative tech, were it not for Natal, I think it would have boosted Sony to 1st place for the best conference, but there is a reason Natal stole the show, it is different the what the wii has to offer, it looks new, it looks technologically advanced, and it looks fun. Move looks like a direct ripoff of the Wiimote and as such the people are drawn to Natal because it's different and "New"
|
what is it you do not under stand..that it can track in 3d or
that it
CAN TRACK IN 3D!
the people who develop on it has stated that it can track in 3D!
hmm. I think Im going with Anton on this one
|
How many times must I say this, 2D replicating 3D is NOT 3D it's 2D on crack. It's easier for everybody to say "it tracks 3D" rather than saying "it's 2D replicating 3D motion tracking" and it sounds better too. It's physically impossible for a 2D camera to track in true 3D.
