Rainbird said:
There is nothing to grasp. You're assuming that technological improvements will lead to better games, which is wrong. Yes, improved technology can help make better games, but it is never guaranteed. I thought Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was better than Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, despite MW2 being technologically superior (and that's before we consider the gimped multiplayer on PC). Assassin's Creed 2 wasn't better than the first game because of the technology either. There weren't many technological changes from the first game to the second, the tech was in many ways the same from the first game but optimized and with some additions. What made AC2 better was the gameplay changes, and the tech changes had little effect on that. |
Eh? I was talking about technology from the beginning, even retard could deduct that better tech doesn't equal better game. But I was trying to say, that when you have possibility of making a game, with certain mechanics etc etc. it's better to make it exclusive and utilize the hardware to the max, than to make it multiplatform and limit yourself.
This had nothing to do with designer standpoint or game mechanics. But if those are solid, exclusive game will be better than the same game, but made multiplatform. I hope that now we are clear, it was misunderstanding all along it seems...
MY HYPE LIST: 1) Gran Turismo 5; 2) Civilization V; 3) Starcraft II; 4) The Last Guardian; 5) Metal Gear Solid: Rising








