vlad321 said:
Morrowind didn't make any sacrifices on the PC however. So you are fine with games that are chronologically made later being worse than games before? You are basically fine with games being worse and worse as time progresses? Oblivion was NOT a good game, why bother with Oblivion when I already have Morrowind? Morrowind is better, that means there is no place for Oblivion. Also yes, as a consumer I expect the developers and companies to bend over and take it up the ass for me and to listen to me, not vice versa. |
Actually Morrowind had to sacrifice something due to XB1 limited RAM. Although Bethesda succeeded to offer wide open spaces and dungeons, thanks to a clever dynamic loading, they couldn't avoid sacrificing continuity between indoors and outdoors. The almost contemporaneous Gothic, PC only, had some separated underground vast levels, but offered continuity between outdoors and all the buildings on the surface and some small and medium dungeons too.







