makingmusic476 said:
Well, GI does suck. :P I gave up on them the month they gave Halo Wars a 9 (one of its highest scores) while giving Killzone 2 an 8 something (one of its lowest). This thread was merely an excuse to point out why Game Informer isn't that good, given their absurdly high score for LP2 and their questionably low score for MH3. Only one person knocked GI specifically because of their SMG score. |
They gave Killzone 2 a 8.75 which is what the game deserved giving an unbalanced multiplayer and a short and forgetful single player. At the same time its a different person reviewing each game so your going to have people who prefer one thing ( graphics ) over another ( gameplay). During the time LBP came out did we bitch about its absurdly high score? no, why? because everyone else was giving the game the same score. BTW GI weren't the only ones to give HM3 a 7, 1UP and edge gave it the same score. Now, if GI gave SMG2 a 10 and MH3 8.5 Wii fans would have bragged about the high scores and then talked about how much more respect they have for GI because they agree with the opinions of the reviewers. Thats what fanboys do, their hypocrites. Just because GI doesn't agree with you doesn't mean their "bad reviewers" it mean they have different taste in games.
GamerTag/PSN ID JoshmyersBV (please add me I have 2 friends on Xbox Live)







