Two years without new Mario games starting from Q3 2012

[mike_intellivision]

Alby_da_Wolf said:

Gamerace said:
Wii___ titles sell a lot more than Mario___. Unless they're Mario ____ Wii.

Regardless, success for 3rd parties is about developing quality brands on Wii with mass market appeal. Problem is they keep sullying their efforts with mediocre titles. Sonic is notorious for it, EA is trying to establish MySims but has been wildly inconsistent with the quality.
Capcom's done a good job with the Resident Evil franchise but it's not mass market enough.

Probably the most established brands on Wii outside of Nintendo is Guitar Hero, Rock Band and Lego which all have broad appeal and had consistent efforts (well, RB started poorly but gradually improved and yes, I'm ignoring Lego Rock Band just like everyone else did). Call of Duty has done well with consistently good titles. Etc.

Hype won't sell on Wii. Brands that equate to quality and family fun do. Problem is outside of those mentioned, no one has or is, developing such brands (besides Nintendo).

Original Nintendo Wii ___ games slaughter a lot of crappy 3rd party "Wii Too" games, this is good, not bad.

But Mario is a cannibal also for good 3rd party games, when he's around it's as if nothing else existed.

Well, we don't know what (if, admittedly anything) Nintendo communicated to third parties.

What I do know if that without first party games, the sales of the unit would slow. Then third parties would use that excuse not to develop for it.

Basically, Nintendo zagged while the rest of the industry zigged. It has split things into two almost equal parts. And most third parties are so heavily invested on the HD side (Xbox 360 and PS3) that they cannot change if they wanted to do so.

Mike from Morgantown