I think this graphics etc. issue is mostly about RAM/VRAM requirements. Since the difference between 360/PS3 CPU and GPU performance compared to PC isn't that big, and since you can't optimize games to a certain hardware on PC, you leave a lot of unused potential, when you can optimize the programs on consoles, which has closed system on hardware, and use their full potential.
So, basically i would see Crysis on 360 more likely than PS3, since 360 has more flexible RAM than PS3.
Now also one thing to note about PC:s, is that they run the operating system while playing games, which requires resources and with consoles you don't run the OS, when every resource is going for the games.
And what it comes to Intel with motherboard integrated GPU, i think it's a good thing. I had a desktop PC with integrated graphics chip, everything worked just fine, i never had any compatibility issues. And if i would have wanted, i could have bought separate graphics card to it. Of course, PC:s with integrated graphics chips don't offer the same performance than PC:s with separate cards, but anyone who plays games with PC, knows that if you want to play latest games, you need to buy the most expensive hardware, not the cheapest.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
